Peer Review Model
NJSEM uses single-anonymous peer review: reviewer identities are not disclosed to authors, while reviewers may receive author-identifying manuscript information. Research manuscripts should normally receive at least two independent expert reviewer reports. Reviewer recommendations inform editorial decisions but do not replace editor judgment.
Workflow: Editorial screening → editor assignment → independent external review → author revision where required → editorial decision → production and publication.
Reviewer Responsibilities
- Maintain confidentiality.
- Declare conflicts of interest.
- Provide objective, evidence-based and constructive reports.
- Report integrity or ethics concerns confidentially to the editor.
- Do not upload confidential manuscripts to unapproved external AI services.
Recommendations
Accept • Minor Revision • Major Revision • Reject
The Reviewer Portal and online Peer Review Form are active for invited reviewers. Reviewers should sign in using their NJSEM account.
Reviewer enquiries: publications@nexsolveai.net